COBOL Interview Questions 2025 - Crack IT Interview

This article concerns real-time and knowledgeable COBOL Interview Questions 2025. It is drafted with the interview theme in mind to provide maximum support for your interview. Go through these COBOL interview Questions to the end, as all scenarios have their importance and learning potential.

To check out other interview Questions:- Click Here.

Disclaimer:
These solutions are based on my experience and best effort. Actual results may vary depending on your setup. Codes may need some tweaking.

1) What business problem does COBOL still solve better than many modern languages?

Handles extremely high-volume batch processing with predictable performance and low variance.
Natively fits record-oriented data and fixed-format files used in core banking, insurance, and payroll.
Mature runtimes on mainframes provide rock-solid reliability, security, and throughput.
Existing COBOL estates encode decades of business rules that would be risky and costly to rewrite.
Operational teams already have monitoring, scheduling, and recovery patterns tuned for COBOL.
Total cost of change is often lower than full rewrites when you factor risk and compliance.
Interoperability options (DB2, VSAM, MQ, CICS) make it a stable hub for enterprise workflows.
Governance and auditability are strong due to deterministic I/O and clear procedural flows.

2) When would you choose batch COBOL over online (CICS) processing?

Large nightly workloads where user interaction is not needed and throughput is king.
End-of-day postings, interest accruals, or premium calculations that require sequenced steps.
Scenarios where you can leverage checkpoint/restart to recover without redoing everything.
When processing windows exist (e.g., after close of business) and SLAs demand predictable runs.
You can optimize I/O with VSAM/DB2 bulk strategies rather than chatty online calls.
Back-office jobs that transform entire files rather than handle one request at a time.
Compliance jobs that must create auditable batch logs and trail files.
Workloads where a single failure should not impact interactive users.

3) How do you explain VSAM vs sequential files to a product owner?

Sequential files are simple, great for linear pass-throughs and streaming transformations.
VSAM adds keyed or indexed access, letting you jump straight to needed records quickly.
For heavy lookups or updates, VSAM reduces full-file scans and cuts elapsed time.
VSAM data structures (KSDS, ESDS, RRDS) map to different access needs and update patterns.
Index maintenance is a trade-off: faster reads but overhead on inserts/updates.
For append-only reporting, sequential can be cheaper and easier to operate.
For OLTP or heavy random access, VSAM KSDS is commonly chosen.
Decision usually follows record volume, access pattern, and SLA expectations.

4) What are typical COBOL pitfalls with numeric data handling?

Truncation when target PIC has fewer digits than the source leads to silent data loss.
Missing ON SIZE ERROR or ROUNDED can create subtle financial discrepancies.
Comp-3 (packed) vs display mismatches cause garbage outputs and reconciliation pain.
Wrong scaling (e.g., cents vs dollars) sneaks in if PIC and business unit don’t align.
Binary vs packed vs display choices affect performance and storage; choose deliberately.
Using MOVE on incompatible PICTUREs introduces unexpected sign or alignment issues.
Not validating input for non-numeric characters leads to abends or bad math.
Lack of unit tests on edge amounts (max/min) hides overflow risks.

5) How do you decide between DB2 tables and VSAM files for a new function?

If relational querying, joins, and ad-hoc analytics matter, DB2 is the natural fit.
For very high-speed keyed I/O with simple schemas, VSAM often wins on latency.
DB2 gives ACID guarantees and strong concurrency controls for multi-user updates.
VSAM offers simpler operations and lower overhead for pure batch pipelines.
Regulatory reporting may prefer DB2 due to SQL tooling and auditability.
Storage and CPU pricing models can tilt the decision either way.
Consider existing skills: DBAs vs file admins, and support SLAs.
Future integration plans (APIs, analytics) usually favor DB2 for flexibility.

6) Where does COBOL shine in performance tuning?

Minimizing I/O: buffering, blocking factors, and fewer file passes yield big wins.
Using proper data types (COMP/COMP-3) to cut conversion overhead in calculations.
Avoiding unnecessary SORTs or combining SORT and COBOL steps efficiently.
Reducing external calls inside tight loops to keep CPU cache hot.
Moving heavy validation to earlier steps to fail fast and skip wasted work.
Leveraging compiler options that optimize for target hardware.
Profiling hot paths instead of guessing where time is spent.
Batch parallelization with job schedulers while respecting file locks.

7) What’s your approach to preventing data corruption in COBOL jobs?

Validate inputs early with strict PIC definitions and reject bad records cleanly.
Use ON SIZE ERROR, INVALID KEY, and return codes to gate writes and commits.
Implement checkpoint/restart with clear, reversible units of work.
Write append-only audit logs so every change has a traceable footprint.
Separate read and write phases to reduce mixed-state complexity.
Maintain idempotency for reprocessing—same input yields same output.
Enforce schema controls in DB2 or file definitions to catch anomalies.
Test with boundary values and dirty data to simulate real-world messiness.

8) How do you manage breaking changes in copybooks across teams?

Version the copybooks and communicate change impact before rollout.
Keep old and new formats in parallel during a transition window.
Provide conversion utilities or mapping spec so downstream can adapt.
Add new fields at the end to avoid disturbing existing offsets.
Maintain a change log that business analysts can read, not just developers.
Use semantic versioning signals in the copybook name or metadata.
Run contract tests that validate all consuming programs still parse correctly.
Time the deployment with scheduler freezes to minimize exposure.

9) What’s your rule of thumb for COBOL error handling strategy?

Fail fast on critical data integrity issues; don’t push bad records downstream.
Use standard return codes and message catalogs for consistent operations.
Distinguish business errors (reportable) from system errors (actionable).
Capture context: keys, offsets, and input snippets to help triage quickly.
Make errors observable in logs that operations already monitor.
Avoid swallowing errors; always propagate to job control for visibility.
Provide rerun instructions in the job’s completion notes.
Keep handlers simple—complex error flows cause new failures.

10) How do you explain EBCDIC vs ASCII to a non-technical stakeholder?

They’re character encodings—like two alphabets for computers.
Mainframes use EBCDIC; many distributed systems use ASCII/UTF-8.
If you mix them without converting, text becomes unreadable gibberish.
File transfers often need code-page translation on the boundary.
Mis-encoded data skews reports or fails downstream validation.
Establish standard conversion points and test with real samples.
Document which fields are purely numeric to avoid conversion mistakes.
Automate conversions in your integration scripts to prevent manual errors.

11) What are common COBOL modernization patterns you’ve used?

Wrap existing programs with APIs or services to expose stable endpoints.
Offload reporting to downstream data platforms via controlled extracts.
Use adapters to translate VSAM/DB2 outputs to modern message formats.
Introduce unit and regression tests around critical business rules first.
Incrementally replace non-core modules rather than big-bang rewrites.
Use feature toggles to shift traffic gradually to new components.
Keep mainframe as system-of-record while adding cloud analytics.
Measure outcomes—latency, error rates, and cost—before declaring victory.

12) When does a full rewrite from COBOL make business sense?

When core rules are poorly understood and need re-discovery anyway.
If licensing/operational costs can be materially reduced without risk spikes.
When agility demands rapid schema and API changes you can’t achieve now.
If skilled support for the specific platform is becoming untenable.
When regulators require capabilities the current stack can’t meet.
When incremental modernization already hit diminishing returns.
If you can parallel-run and prove parity before cutover.
Only after a frank risk and value assessment with business owners.

13) How do you decide between COBOL on z/OS vs off-mainframe runtimes?

Consider required throughput, security posture, and compliance controls.
If you rely heavily on CICS, MQ, or DB2 z/OS, staying on mainframe reduces integration risk.
For batch-only workloads with minimal platform dependencies, off-mainframe can work.
Evaluate total cost of ownership including tooling and talent availability.
Latency to upstream/downstream systems may favor one environment.
Check vendor support for your specific compiler features and file formats.
Test performance with realistic data volumes, not toy benches.
Plan for operational maturity: scheduling, backup, DR, and monitoring.

14) What’s the risk of ignoring COBOL compiler options?

You may ship with defaults that hurt performance or numeric precision.
Debug information may be missing when an incident happens.
Size and alignment choices can waste memory or cause truncation.
Runtime behaviors (e.g., AP options) differ and break assumptions.
Optimizations can reorder code in ways that affect timing or I/O.
Mixed team environments lose consistency without a standard set.
Compliance reviews may flag unknown defaults as uncontrolled risk.
Always document and baseline options as part of the build.

15) How do you approach test data in regulated COBOL systems?

Prefer synthetic data that mirrors distributions without exposing PII.
Mask production extracts if you must use real shapes and edge cases.
Keep referential integrity so joins and keys still make sense.
Include dirty data examples to test validation and error paths.
Version and tag datasets so failing tests are reproducible.
Automate refresh so teams don’t hoard stale private copies.
Clear approvals and access logs satisfy audit requirements.
Tie test cases to business scenarios, not just code branches.

16) What’s your strategy for COBOL code readability in large programs?

Use meaningful paragraph and section names that map to business steps.
Keep data declarations near the logic that uses them via copybooks where sensible.
Limit nested IFs; prefer explicit flags or EVALUATE for clarity.
Break monoliths into callable modules with clear contracts.
Standardize comments: why something exists, not restating code.
Enforce a style guide so mixed teams produce familiar layouts.
Avoid magic numbers—define constants with business names.
Regularly refactor hot paths when you touch them for defects.

17) What typical performance wins have you seen with SORT tuning?

Use SUM and INCLUDE/OMIT in the SORT step to reduce COBOL post-processing.
Choose optimal sort keys and eliminate unnecessary secondary keys.
Increase block sizes and memory allocation within safe ops limits.
Combine multiple small sorts into a single pass where feasible.
Push data cleansing into the sort when simple conditions suffice.
Remove redundant sorts by reusing intermediate files.
Profile I/O vs CPU to find the real bottleneck before tweaking.
Validate gains with production-scale samples, not dev stubs.

18) How do you keep COBOL jobs restartable?

Define clear checkpoints after logical units of work.
Write out restart control records with last successful key/offset.
Ensure idempotency so reruns don’t double-post or re-invoice.
Separate read and write phases to avoid half-applied states.
Purge or version temp files so restarts see a clean slate.
Document rerun parameters in the job description members.
Alert on mismatch between restart state and inputs.
Test restart paths during QA, not in production emergencies.

19) What trade-offs do you consider with COMP vs COMP-3?

COMP (binary) is faster on arithmetic but can vary by platform alignment.
COMP-3 (packed) is compact and common for financial fields.
Display (zoned) is readable but space-heavy and slower to process.
COMP-3 eases interchange with existing financial copybooks.
COMP can reduce CPU on heavy math loops if PICs align well.
Conversion costs arise when mixing types; plan boundaries carefully.
Storage and CPU pricing can push you one way or the other.
Choose per field, not blanket rules—match business usage.

20) How do you handle date logic reliably in COBOL?

Store canonical formats (YYYYMMDD) to simplify comparisons.
Validate inputs strictly and reject impossible dates early.
Centralize date routines for add/subtract and fiscal periods.
Consider time zones only at the edges; keep core logic date-only.
Unit test around month-end, leap years, and daylight changes.
Avoid string hacks; use numeric PICs for math.
Document calendar assumptions with business owners.
Keep a holiday table under change control for accuracy.

21) What’s your method for de-risking a COBOL change in a critical payment job?

Identify blast radius: upstream feeds, downstream postings, and reports.
Create targeted regression tests on golden datasets with known outputs.
Parallel-run old vs new and diff the results at record and total levels.
Feature-toggle the new path to revert quickly if metrics spike.
Schedule change during low-risk windows with ops on standby.
Pre-agree rollback criteria with business stakeholders.
Capture detailed logs for the first few runs.
Post-implementation review to cement learnings.

22) How do you decide to split a large COBOL program into subprograms?

If different teams own different business areas, separation helps velocity.
When modules have distinct change cadences or release schedules.
Performance reasons: isolate hot loops to optimize independently.
Complexity reduction when nesting and conditionals become unreadable.
Testing benefits: smaller units are easier to validate.
Reuse potential for common validation or formatting routines.
Deployment flexibility for partial updates.
Only split where interfaces are stable and meaningful.

23) What’s your approach to handling duplicate records in batch inputs?

Classify duplicates: true duplicates vs legitimate repeats with new timestamps.
Use composite keys that reflect real business uniqueness.
De-dupe early to avoid inflating downstream volumes.
Keep a quarantine file for manual review when rules are ambiguous.
Log counts of dropped vs accepted for transparency.
Provide feedback to sources so data quality improves upstream.
Idempotent processing ensures re-sent files don’t re-post.
Document decision rules for auditors and support teams.

24) How do you keep regulatory reports consistent over time?

Freeze copybooks and SQL used for each report version.
Tag code and JCL with a report version that ties to policy dates.
Build an immutable reference dataset for regression checks.
Provide parameterized effective dates for rule changes.
Track source data lineage and transformations in run logs.
Engage compliance early when fields or definitions change.
Keep data dictionaries user-readable, not just dev-friendly.
Train ops on what constitutes a material change.

25) What are common COBOL security considerations you enforce?

Principle of least privilege on datasets and DB2 authorities.
Mask sensitive fields in logs and error messages.
Validate all external inputs; never trust feed cleanliness.
Separate duties: developers can’t move code directly to prod.
Encrypt data at rest and in transit where platform supports.
Rotate credentials and avoid embedding secrets in code.
Monitor access to critical files with alerts on anomalies.
Review third-party interfaces for contract and schema drift.

26) How do you explain the business value of copybooks to a PO?

They’re like shared contracts for data—one change, many programs benefit.
Reduce duplication and keep formats consistent across teams.
Speed up onboarding because structures are documented once.
Enable safer refactors since producers/consumers share definitions.
Aligns with audit needs: you can trace where fields flow.
Makes regression testing easier with stable schemas.
Lowers long-term maintenance by avoiding one-off layouts.
Encourages domain-driven design even in legacy code.

27) What’s your guideline for logging in COBOL batch jobs?

Log key milestones: start, checkpoints, totals, and end status.
Include counts for reads, writes, rejects, and duplicates.
Show control parameters so reruns can be reproduced.
Mask sensitive data but keep keys for traceability.
Keep logs machine-parsable for monitoring tools.
Use consistent formats across all jobs for familiarity.
Avoid chatty logs inside tight loops to save CPU.
Retain logs per policy for audits and trend analysis.

28) How do you reduce mainframe costs without harming SLAs?

Consolidate jobs and remove redundant passes through data.
Tune I/O and SORT steps to cut CPU and elapsed time.
Move non-critical reporting off the mainframe via controlled extracts.
Adjust scheduling to cheaper windows where pricing differs.
Archive or compress older datasets appropriately.
Use realistic sizing for files and buffer pools.
Measure regularly; cost optimizations decay over time.
Collaborate with capacity planners, not just dev teams.

29) What is your stance on comments vs self-documenting COBOL?

Favor clear names and structured paragraphs first.
Comment the “why” behind decisions, not every MOVE statement.
Keep high-level flow notes at section starts for newcomers.
Update comments during code review so they don’t rot.
Avoid massive comment blocks that duplicate specs verbatim.
Use change headers with ticket links and dates.
Ensure copybooks carry field meanings and units.
Treat comments as part of code quality, not afterthoughts.

30) How do you approach SLA breaches in overnight COBOL batches?

Triage: identify the slowest step using run stats and SMF data.
Check for data skew or unusual input volumes first.
Validate whether external dependencies introduced latency.
Apply tactical fixes (e.g., reblocking, sort key tweak) for tonight.
Plan structural optimizations for the next release cycle.
Communicate impacts and recovery time to business early.
Capture root cause and prevention actions in the postmortem.
Add monitors to catch early warnings next time.

31) What’s your risk policy for file format changes from partners?

Never auto-promote new formats to prod without a gated test.
Use schema validation at ingest to fail fast with clear messages.
Keep backward compatibility windows where possible.
Provide conversion utilities and versioned copybooks.
Add metrics: count unknown fields or missing mandatory ones.
Roll out in a small pilot partner before global adoption.
Agree on deprecation timelines and publish them.
Keep emergency rollback for previous accepted format.

32) How do you balance accuracy vs speed in financial COBOL jobs?

Accuracy is non-negotiable; speed is optimized after correctness.
Choose COMP-3 and proper scaling to avoid rounding errors.
Batch windows inform how much parallelization you can push.
Pre-aggregate where possible to reduce heavy downstream math.
Use checkpoints to avoid losing hours of work on late failures.
Profile hot spots before touching numerics.
Align with finance on rounding and tie-breaker rules.
Document calculations so auditors can replicate results.

33) What lessons have you learned about Y2K-style date bugs?

Hidden assumptions lurk in legacy fields; don’t trust names alone.
Two-digit years and derived logic cause silent misclassifications.
Centralize date arithmetic and comparison utilities.
Test with future dates and simulated policy changes.
Make business sign off on how to interpret ambiguous data.
Keep migration notes—future teams will need context.
Automate scanning for date patterns in copybooks.
Never postpone date cleanup; it only gets costlier.

34) What’s your approach to onboarding juniors to COBOL quickly?

Start with reading real job logs and understanding data flows.
Give small, safe bug fixes that touch clear business logic.
Pair them on code reviews to learn idioms and pitfalls.
Teach copybook thinking and record layouts early.
Use a test harness so they can see cause-effect instantly.
Share a glossary of domain terms used in the estate.
Celebrate first production save to build confidence.
Provide a “when to ask for help” checklist.

35) How do you keep a COBOL codebase auditable?

Tag releases and tie them to change requests in a central system.
Keep a single source of truth for copybooks and JCL members.
Force code reviews with checklists for risk hotspots.
Store run artifacts: logs, control cards, and metrics.
Keep traceability from requirement to program to output.
Document data lineage across jobs and datasets.
Limit emergency fixes and post-review them next day.
Train auditors on your conventions to reduce friction.

36) What’s the biggest source of production issues in COBOL estates?

Schema drift between producers and consumers of data.
Unclear error handling that hides root causes.
Performance assumptions that fail under unusual volumes.
Forgotten temporary files or datasets filling up.
Copybook changes without version coordination.
Non-restartable jobs that waste whole windows on small failures.
Edge cases in numerics and date logic left untested.
Manual operations that don’t survive staff turnover.

37) How do you evaluate a COBOL program for reuse potential?

Look for pure functions: validation, formatting, calculation modules.
Confirm dependencies are abstracted behind clean interfaces.
Measure side effects—fewer effects mean easier reuse.
Assess parameter clarity and data structure stability.
Check performance under expected reuse scenarios.
Ensure error handling is generic, not app-specific.
Update documentation to advertise what it does well.
Pilot reuse in a non-critical path first.

38) What’s your process for handling late incoming files in the batch chain?

Set a firm cutoff and document business trade-offs.
Allow a grace period with alerts to stakeholders.
Skip or stub downstream jobs with clear flags to avoid stale data.
Backfill in the next cycle with compensating logic.
Log exceptions for reconciliation teams to resolve.
Negotiate SLAs with partners to reduce surprises.
Consider near-real-time ingestion for flaky sources.
Review patterns quarterly and adjust schedules.

39) How do you stop “logic leaks” when multiple programs compute the same KPI?

Centralize KPI calculations in one approved module.
Publish a data contract and test suite for KPI correctness.
Deprecate local copies with a clear sunset plan.
Version outputs so consumers can roll forward safely.
Provide guidance for rounding and tie-breakers.
Monitor discrepancies across consumers and reconcile quickly.
Educate teams on the cost of divergent implementations.
Reward reuse in review metrics to change behavior.

40) What factors guide your file blocking and buffering choices?

Record size and variability affect optimal block size.
Storage vs CPU trade-offs differ by dataset and access pattern.
Sequential reads benefit from larger blocks; random less so.
Memory limits and competing jobs cap buffer allocations.
Sort utilities may prefer different settings than COBOL steps.
Measure end-to-end elapsed, not just CPU, to judge success.
Avoid magic defaults—test on production-like volumes.
Document chosen values and revisit after major data growth.

41) How do you approach COBOL and message queues integration?

Use queues to decouple batch timing from upstream systems.
Define message schemas that map cleanly to copybooks.
Ensure idempotency so re-delivered messages don’t double-post.
Monitor dead-letter queues and automate reprocessing.
Batch messages for throughput, but keep order where required.
Backpressure strategies prevent queue explosions during spikes.
Security policies must cover message content and endpoints.
Test end-to-end with realistic volumes and failure injection.

42) What are your rules for safe currency handling?

Always store with explicit scale (e.g., cents) to avoid rounding chaos.
Use COMP-3 for compact, precise decimal math where appropriate.
Apply ROUNDED and ON SIZE ERROR with agreed business rules.
Keep conversion rates versioned and time-stamped.
Reconcile totals at each pipeline stage to catch drift early.
Treat negative and sign handling explicitly in PICs.
Include sanity checks on outlier amounts.
Log audit trails for all adjustments.

43) How do you explain CICS vs batch to a business user?

CICS is for interactive transactions—fast request/response.
Batch is for large, scheduled workloads with no user in the loop.
CICS impacts customer experience directly; batch affects back-office totals.
SLAs differ: CICS favors low latency; batch favors throughput.
Recovery differs: CICS uses transactions; batch relies on checkpoints.
Cost profiles vary; CICS runs all day while batch uses windows.
Monitoring differs—APM for CICS, job schedulers for batch.
Many systems use both, each where it’s strongest.

44) What’s your strategy for preventing COBOL “big-ball-of-mud” programs?

Establish module boundaries tied to business capabilities.
Enforce maximum program size or complexity thresholds.
Regularly extract reusable routines into libraries.
Require architectural review for cross-module dependencies.
Keep data flow diagrams updated for visibility.
Reward refactoring during BAU, not just big projects.
Use static analysis to flag complexity hotspots.
Protect the boundaries in code reviews.

45) How do you maintain parity during a phased migration off VSAM?

Build dual-write or dual-read bridges with reconciliations.
Parallel-run and compare at record and aggregate levels.
Freeze copybooks where possible; map deltas carefully.
Cut over by business slice, not by random technical slice.
Automate diffs and tolerance thresholds to avoid noise.
Keep a rollback plan ready for each cutover step.
Time changes with low-risk periods and strong ops staffing.
Close the loop with sign-off from business controllers.

46) What’s your approach to COBOL defect triage in production?

Reproduce with the exact inputs and environment parameters.
Classify severity by customer impact and data risk.
Identify the failing step and isolate minimal changes.
Prefer reversible fixes that don’t expand blast radius.
Communicate timelines and mitigations early and clearly.
Backfill or compensate data if any was missed or duplicated.
Capture the learning in a shared knowledge base.
Add tests that would have caught the issue earlier.

47) How do you justify investing in COBOL unit testing?

Faster feedback loops reduce risk and rework.
Encodes tribal knowledge about edge cases into executable checks.
Makes refactoring and modernization safer and cheaper.
Improves onboarding speed for new engineers.
Builds trust with business through consistent outcomes.
Cuts incident count and weekend fire-drills.
Helps auditors see controlled, repeatable processes.
Pays for itself in fewer production surprises.

48) What are common mistakes with PIC definitions?

Misaligned signs causing negative values to print wrong.
Insufficient integer or decimal places leading to truncation.
Using display types where packed would be better for math.
Forgetting JUSTIFIED RIGHT for fixed-width outputs.
Overusing alphanumeric PICs for numeric content.
Inconsistent scaling across related fields.
Ignoring leading zeros and alignment in reports.
Not documenting business meaning and units.

49) How do you handle late requirement changes near go-live?

Freeze core scope and negotiate a post-go-live patch path.
Use feature flags to ship dormant code safely.
Prioritize changes that reduce risk over “nice to haves.”
Expand testing on impacted scenarios, not everything.
Communicate impacts on cutover rehearsals and training.
Increase monitoring and rollback readiness for first runs.
Get explicit sign-offs acknowledging residual risks.
Document the decision trail for audits.

50) What’s your approach to COBOL code reviews that adds real value?

Focus on correctness, clarity, and data integrity first.
Check numeric handling and date logic deliberately.
Validate restartability and error handling flows.
Look for unnecessary I/O and sort passes.
Confirm copybook version usage and field mappings.
Ensure logs are helpful and not leaking sensitive data.
Use small, frequent reviews to keep momentum.
Record action items and close them before merge.

51) How do you choose between flat files and APIs for downstream sharing?

Flat files suit large, scheduled, append-only deliveries.
APIs fit near-real-time needs and selective queries.
Partners’ capabilities and security posture matter.
File formats may be governed by existing contracts.
APIs need rate-limits and retry strategies; files need checkpoints.
Operational tooling may favor one or the other today.
Consider total cost of change over the next few years.
Sometimes both are needed during transition periods.

52) What do you watch for when using temporary datasets?

Cleanup to avoid disk bloat and unexpected out-of-space failures.
Correct allocation sizes to prevent frequent extents.
Naming conventions that won’t collide across jobs.
Security—temp doesn’t mean “unprotected.”
Persistence across steps only when intentional.
Logging of temp usage for capacity planning.
Avoid temp dependence that blocks restartability.
Time-bound retention policies enforced by ops.

53) How do you keep COBOL and DB2 changes in lockstep?

Coordinate DDL changes with program releases via a shared plan.
Use views or compatibility layers during transitions.
Versioned copybooks for host variables keep fields aligned.
Backward-compatible changes first; breaking ones last.
Run SQL plan binds in controlled windows with rollback.
Prove parity with regression SQL tests.
Communicate data dictionary updates broadly.
Monitor access plans for performance regressions.

54) What’s your approach to sizing COBOL jobs for future growth?

Model volume projections and peak scenarios with business.
Stress-test with 2–3× current volumes to find limits.
Identify I/O hotspots and plan for partitioning or sharding.
Ensure schedulers can parallelize without deadlocks.
Keep file naming and allocation scalable from day one.
Track key metrics per run to spot growth trends early.
Revisit assumptions after big business events or mergers.
Budget time for periodic performance tune-ups.

55) How do you ensure clean handoffs between COBOL teams and Ops?

Provide runbooks with parameters, restart points, and contacts.
Standardize success/failure codes and message formats.
Include data quality checks Ops can execute independently.
Automate health checks before heavy downstream steps.
Keep clear escalation paths and on-call schedules.
Review postmortems together to improve both sides.
Share dashboards that visualize throughput and errors.
Avoid tribal knowledge by documenting playbooks.

56) What’s your stance on feature toggles in COBOL estates?

They let you deploy early and activate when safe.
Reduce risky big-bang releases in critical systems.
Support A/B validation and fast rollback.
Add some complexity—keep toggle logic simple and centralized.
Require clear naming and expiry dates to avoid toggle sprawl.
Log toggle states for audit and troubleshooting.
Pair with regression tests on both on/off states.
Use them sparingly on core calculation paths.

57) How do you handle upstream source data that frequently changes?

Negotiate stable contracts and versioned schemas.
Build adapters that map new to old formats during transitions.
Maintain compatibility windows and publish timelines.
Monitor for unexpected fields and fail fast with clear errors.
Keep a sandbox to trial upcoming changes safely.
Communicate regularly—technical and non-technical updates.
Automate contract tests against partner samples.
Log deviations and share feedback loops to improve.

58) What are your best practices for COBOL program parameters?

Keep parameters explicit rather than overloading meanings.
Validate values early and exit with clear messages on bad inputs.
Default conservatively to avoid destructive actions.
Document each parameter in the runbook with examples.
Log received parameters for post-run analysis.
Avoid hidden environment dependencies.
Version parameter sets for reproducible runs.
Provide safe dry-run switches for risky operations.

59) How do you prevent “silent failures” in COBOL pipelines?

Treat zero-record outputs as warnings unless expected.
Validate counts: inputs, processed, rejected, and written.
Check return codes after every critical operation.
Use alerts when thresholds deviate from historical norms.
Write error samples to a reviewable file, not just logs.
Avoid broad exception handlers that hide root causes.
Add canary checks at pipeline boundaries.
Regularly test failure paths, not just happy paths.

60) What is your playbook for end-to-end reconciliation?

Define invariant totals (e.g., amount sums, record counts) at each stage.
Compute pre/post totals and compare with tolerances agreed by business.
Log discrepancies with keys for targeted investigation.
Automate reconciliation reports and deliver to owners daily.
Keep historical baselines to spot slow drifts over time.
Escalate quickly when financial impacts cross thresholds.
Use reconciliation results to prioritize defect fixes.
Celebrate clean runs to reinforce operational discipline.

Post Views: 17