Custom Entities vs Standard Entities Scenario-Based Questions 2025

This article concerns real-time and knowledgeable Custom Entities vs Standard Entities Scenario-Based Questions 2025. It is drafted with the interview theme in mind to provide maximum support for your interview. Go through these Custom Entities vs Standard Entities Scenario-Based Questions 2025 to the end, as all scenarios have their importance and learning potential.

To check out other Scenarios Based Questions:- Click Here.

Disclaimer:
These solutions are based on my experience and best effort. Actual results may vary depending on your setup. Codes may need some tweaking.

Q1. When starting a new project, how do you decide whether to use a standard entity or create a custom one?

First, I check if the standard entity already covers 80–90% of the business requirement.
If yes, I reuse it and extend it with fields, views, or business rules.
If it’s a totally different business process, I go for a custom entity.
I also consider future upgrades—custom entities mean less dependency on Microsoft’s release cycle.
For client-specific needs not found in OOB entities, custom entities work better.
But if I can avoid custom, I always prefer extending standard—it’s safer for long-term support.

Q2. Have you ever regretted choosing a custom entity instead of a standard one? Why?

Yes, in one project, we created a custom entity instead of customizing the existing Opportunity entity.
Later, this caused issues with integration and Power BI reports.
We also missed out on built-in platform features like forecasting and pipeline charts.
Had to spend extra time building everything from scratch.
We finally decided to migrate to the standard entity, which was painful.
Lesson learned: unless there’s a strong reason, reuse standard entities whenever possible.

Q3. In real-world implementations, what’s the main risk of overusing custom entities?

They increase technical debt and make maintenance harder.
Custom entities often break during solution upgrades or app updates.
Reporting and analytics become siloed or disconnected from native dashboards.
Security roles need to be manually configured, adding overhead.
It also impacts performance if too many entities are added without real need.
Teams often lose visibility into platform features when everything is custom.

Q4. What business scenario justifies creating a custom entity even when a similar standard entity exists?

If the process is heavily regulated or legally different from standard CRM logic.
When workflows or integrations require different data architecture.
If the standard entity has dependencies or constraints we can’t modify.
When reporting requirements are drastically different and not reusable.
Or if the same entity is reused in multiple apps with distinct logic.
In such cases, custom entity provides clean separation and avoids confusion.

Q5. What’s a good example where extending a standard entity saved your team time?

In a sales automation project, we needed a field for “Vendor Type.”
Instead of creating a new entity, we added it to the Account entity.
Reused all views, forms, and dashboards instantly.
No training required for users since UI was already familiar.
Reports worked out-of-the-box with minimal tweaks.
It saved at least two weeks of development and testing effort.

Q6. Can using too many custom entities slow down your Dynamics 365 environment?

Yes, definitely—it affects metadata load time and system performance.
Each custom entity adds complexity to solution deployment.
Users face slower form loads and navigation if too many entities exist.
Mobile and offline sync performance also drops.
Even admin tasks like managing permissions become cumbersome.
Best practice is to review entity usage quarterly and clean unused ones.

Q7. How do you communicate to a client that a standard entity is better than building a new one?

I use visuals to show overlaps between standard and their process.
Demonstrate how quickly we can tweak standard entities to match their flow.
Share examples from similar clients or industries.
Highlight future benefits like Microsoft support and feature compatibility.
Discuss the cost and time of creating and maintaining a custom entity.
Clients usually agree once they see the bigger picture.

Q8. What is a typical pitfall teams fall into when choosing between custom and standard entities?

Assuming a new entity is needed without checking platform capabilities.
Not involving a solution architect early to review the data model.
Creating redundant entities that confuse users and developers later.
Forgetting about Power BI, integrations, or customer insights alignment.
Ignoring licensing implications tied to entity usage.
Skipping proper documentation makes future teams unaware of the decision.

Q9. Can custom entities break during Dynamics 365 upgrades or patches?

Yes, if they rely on deprecated APIs or unsupported features.
Custom plugins tied to those entities often break.
UI components like custom controls might stop rendering correctly.
Testing time increases during every major update.
Any third-party app assuming standard schema might fail.
That’s why we test custom entities in sandbox during preview releases.

Q10. What’s your personal checklist before deciding to create a new entity in Dynamics 365?

Is there a standard entity that can serve 70–80% of the need?
Can we extend an existing entity with minimal risk?
Will the new entity impact security model, reporting, or performance?
Do we have reusability or any duplication with other entities?
Are we solving a one-time problem or a reusable process?
What’s the long-term cost of maintaining this entity?

Q11. How do you handle a situation where the client insists on a custom entity that duplicates a standard one?

First, I walk them through the functional gaps—often, there’s none.
Show them how standard entities integrate better with Dynamics ecosystem.
Highlight hidden costs like extra maintenance, testing, and training.
Share examples where clients regretted redundant entities later.
Offer a side-by-side prototype comparison to prove efficiency.
If they still insist, I document the justification and risks clearly.

Q12. What role does reporting play in choosing between custom vs standard entities?

Standard entities come with prebuilt views and Power BI support.
Reports are easier to build when the schema aligns with Microsoft’s core.
Custom entities need manual data connections and mapping in reports.
You often lose native dashboards tied to Sales or Customer Service modules.
Teams struggle to join data if relationships aren’t mapped properly.
Reporting complexity is one of the top reasons to avoid unnecessary custom entities.

Q13. How do you decide whether to use an activity entity or a custom non-activity entity?

If the record represents time-bound, trackable interactions—go with activity.
Activities integrate with timeline, Outlook, and customer journeys.
If it’s just structured data or lookup records, use non-activity custom entities.
Activities can’t be easily customized with multiple forms or logic.
Activity entities also count differently in storage, so that’s a cost factor.
Use the entity type that fits the purpose, not just UI preference.

Q14. What impact does entity choice have on Power Apps Portals or Copilot support?

Standard entities are better supported out-of-the-box in portals.
Copilot understands standard entities better for AI-powered suggestions.
Custom entities require schema exposure and training for AI to work.
Portals need explicit configuration for custom table permissions.
Time-to-market increases if Copilot or Portals are part of the roadmap.
Always ask about future channel plans before choosing custom entities.

Q15. Can solution layering become problematic with custom entities?

Yes, especially in multi-solution environments or ISV scenarios.
Unmanaged layers on custom entities can override managed ones.
Rollbacks are tough if no backup is taken before publishing changes.
Teams often forget to export dependency-aware patches.
Standard entities have better support for patching and layering.
Clean ALM practices are a must if you rely heavily on custom entities.

Q16. In what cases have you deprecated a custom entity later in a project?

Once, we had a “Service Tracker” entity built from scratch.
Later, we realized the Case entity with a few tweaks could serve better.
Migration was painful—data mapping, workflows, and reports all changed.
We deprecated the custom entity gradually, archiving old records.
It taught us to pilot with standard entities first before jumping to custom.
Now, we always do a proof of concept with OOB entities before custom creation.

Q17. Is there a risk of using a standard entity when you should’ve gone custom?

Yes, forcing a standard entity into an unnatural use case can backfire.
Leads to messy forms, overused custom fields, and irrelevant sections.
Users get confused with fields they don’t need or understand.
Reports show mixed data that doesn’t make sense contextually.
In such cases, a clean custom entity gives better control and clarity.
The key is to balance reuse with business logic fit.

Q18. How does licensing influence the decision between custom and standard entities?

Microsoft enforces API and storage limits based on entity usage.
Some custom entities may require additional licensing if exposed externally.
Standard entities are generally more optimized for included features.
You need to check if the entity is covered under standard entitlements.
Power Platform API consumption differs based on entity type.
It’s always smart to involve a licensing expert when defining schema.

Q19. What’s a lesson you learned from underestimating the power of standard entities?

We once bypassed the Opportunity entity thinking it was too restrictive.
Built a custom “Deal Tracker” entity with separate logic.
Missed out on forecasting, pipeline stages, and AI insights.
Eventually had to integrate both, creating double the effort.
Standard entities are optimized with decades of CRM learnings.
Don’t reinvent what’s already been tested across thousands of clients.

Q20. How do you explain the concept of “platform alignment” in this context?

Platform alignment means using Dynamics the way it’s designed to work.
It’s about aligning your entities with core modules like Sales or Service.
When you align, you get plug-and-play with Power BI, Copilot, and Portals.
Upgrades, support, and integrations also become smoother.
Custom entities move you away from this alignment if overused.
Balance is key—align where possible, customize only when it adds value.

Q21. How do you balance reuse of standard entities vs customization in agile projects?

I start with MVP using standard entities to deliver faster.
Custom entities are only considered after user feedback proves it’s essential.
This helps avoid waste and aligns with iterative delivery goals.
Standard entities speed up initial sprints due to existing UI and automation.
Customization is introduced only if gaps are significant and repeated.
This phased approach keeps development lean and user-driven.

Q22. What are some indirect costs of using too many custom entities?

Increased solution size leads to slower deployments and more errors.
More training needed for end users due to unfamiliar structures.
Developers spend more time on entity-specific plugins and workflows.
Higher testing effort during updates or integration testing.
More work for admins to manage security, roles, and access.
It silently kills agility and adds long-term maintenance overhead.

Q23. What mistake do teams make when naming custom entities?

Naming them too generically or similar to standard entities causes confusion.
Users don’t know which entity to use if both exist for the same purpose.
Developers often reuse names across environments, breaking ALM.
Bad names break integrations when table names change.
Naming should reflect the purpose, audience, and uniqueness clearly.
A naming convention agreed upfront saves chaos later.

Q24. In what scenario would you recommend cloning a standard entity as custom?

When business logic is 100% different and conflicts with existing features.
If the standard entity is tied to workflows you can’t alter or override safely.
When the UI needs to be completely redesigned for a different persona.
If analytics or integrations need isolated data sets.
Only after ensuring it won’t affect platform harmony or upgrades.
It’s rare but valid in regulated industries like healthcare or banking.

Q25. What’s your view on using “shadow entities” to support standard entities?

Shadow entities are helpful when standard tables need supporting metadata.
They store additional data without cluttering the main entity.
Used for lookups, mappings, audit logs, or advanced configurations.
Keeps the core entity clean and focused on user-visible fields.
It’s a smart design when done intentionally with future growth in mind.
Shouldn’t be used to duplicate the same process logic.

Q26. How do standard entities help in user adoption?

Users already see familiar labels, forms, and workflows.
Training is faster since it builds on Microsoft’s default UX.
Built-in dashboards provide instant value with real data.
Mobile apps and Outlook clients work seamlessly with standard entities.
You avoid confusing users with too many new entities.
Overall, adoption improves when you extend instead of reinvent.

Q27. What’s a real scenario where you had to reverse a custom-vs-standard decision?

We used a custom “Support Ticket” entity instead of Case for a helpdesk.
Six months in, we needed omnichannel, SLA, and entitlement features.
Rebuilding those in custom was infeasible.
We re-mapped the process to standard Case and migrated data.
Took 3 weeks, but long-term, it saved us major rework.
Taught us to anticipate future growth when designing the data model.

Q28. Can too many custom entities impact Power Automate flows?

Yes, custom entities don’t always appear in templates or triggers.
They require explicit table references and manual configuration.
Standard entities offer more connectors, triggers, and ready-made flows.
Flow creators might face permission or API issues with custom ones.
Reusability drops when flows aren’t generic.
It’s best to align with standard tables if flows are a big part of the solution.

Q29. What considerations matter when using custom entities with Dataverse?

You must define ownership (user/team vs organization) carefully.
Custom entities may not support system-defined behaviors.
Relationship design must follow Dataverse best practices.
Security roles need to be crafted manually, not inherited like standard ones.
Storage costs apply separately for custom tables.
Be precise with schema design or Dataverse benefits won’t be realized.

Q30. Do integrations become harder with custom entities?

Yes, external systems need to be taught the schema.
Field mappings, APIs, and transformations must be built from scratch.
You lose plug-and-play features from integration tools.
Third-party apps or connectors won’t recognize custom tables.
Data sync needs careful schema validation every time.
Always prefer standard if integration is a high-priority requirement.

Q31. Why do architects prefer extending standard entities over starting custom?

It aligns with platform best practices and reduces design debt.
You inherit all features: UI, security, mobile support, and integrations.
Saves time on designing everything from zero.
Reduces resistance from change management and user training.
Platform updates are smoother and safer.
Custom is a last resort, not the first step.

Q32. How do you justify creating a custom entity during stakeholder discussions?

I prepare a business case with risks, trade-offs, and future implications.
Highlight what’s not possible with standard entities even after extensions.
Show effort estimation for both paths—custom and standard.
Share precedent cases from similar industries or projects.
Include long-term considerations like ALM, upgrades, and support.
Only proceed if the business value is clear and sustainable.

Q33. What questions do you ask before creating any custom entity?

What’s the business goal? Is it unique enough to deserve a new entity?
Can we achieve the same by extending an existing one?
How does it affect reporting, security, and integrations?
Will users understand and adopt it easily?
How does it impact licensing and API limits?
Is this decision reversible if things change?

Q34. How does the use of custom vs standard entities affect ALM (Application Lifecycle Management)?

Custom entities create more components to track in solutions.
ALM tools struggle with dependency resolution for custom tables.
Versioning, rollback, and layering become complex.
Managed vs unmanaged decisions become riskier.
Standard entities are stable and less prone to deployment errors.
Good ALM requires clean entity design from day one.

Q35. Can misuse of custom entities cause duplication in your data model?

Yes, if multiple teams create similar entities without coordination.
You end up with “Leads1,” “Leads_Custom,” “PotentialClients”—all doing the same.
Data quality drops, reporting becomes inconsistent.
Users don’t know which one to use or trust.
Governance and solution architecture reviews prevent such mess.
It’s a classic case of short-term gain, long-term pain.

Q36. How do Power BI dashboards behave with standard vs custom entities?

Standard entities are easier to connect with prebuilt data models.
Custom entities require schema definition and DAX configurations.
Filters and slicers work more naturally with standard relationships.
Custom requires more time for joins and performance tuning.
Users expect consistency—standard entities provide that out-of-the-box.
Fewer surprises when using Microsoft’s analytics stack.

Q37. Do sandbox environments treat custom entities differently during testing?

Not really in functionality, but more setup is required.
You have to assign roles, permissions, and test data explicitly.
Test cases may need to be adjusted due to missing metadata.
Standard entities are more predictable and quick to test.
Custom ones often require custom test scripts.
In agile, this slows velocity and increases QA overhead.

Q38. What role does ISV solution compatibility play in this decision?

Most ISVs expect standard schema alignment.
Using too many custom entities makes ISV integration difficult.
Support teams might reject issues due to non-standard tables.
Plugins, apps, or connectors from ISVs may not recognize custom entities.
It becomes your job to maintain compatibility forever.
Think twice before going custom if ISV usage is part of your plan.

Q39. How does performance tuning differ between standard and custom entities?

Standard entities are already optimized by Microsoft.
Custom entities need index planning, form design, and field limits enforced manually.
FetchXML queries on custom entities can be slower without optimization.
APIs or integrations also need tuning for custom schemas.
Monitoring is harder unless telemetry is planned from the start.
Performance tuning becomes a full-time job with poor design.

Q40. How do licensing limits affect custom entities used in Power Platform?

Each custom entity can consume API calls and storage differently.
Premium licensing might be triggered if you exceed thresholds.
Power Apps per-app plans have entity and flow limits.
Custom entities may also count toward capacity usage faster.
You need to budget for that upfront.
Always validate licensing impact before building anything custom.

Q41. How does table ownership type influence your entity design decisions?

If the entity needs user-level security, I use user/team ownership.
For reference/config data, organization ownership is lighter and faster.
Custom entities default to user/team and need careful planning.
Standard entities usually come with pre-defined ownership and logic.
Choosing the wrong type can break security or reporting models.
Always align ownership with the business process, not just the form.

Q42. What’s a real risk when multiple developers create custom entities independently?

You end up with redundant or overlapping tables—hard to maintain.
No one knows which entity to use in forms, flows, or reports.
Naming conventions break, causing deployment errors across environments.
Business logic gets duplicated in plugins or Power Automate flows.
Migrations and data merges become nightmares.
Governance and centralized review prevent this mess.

Q43. Why is security modeling more challenging with custom entities?

Unlike standard entities, you must define every role, privilege, and access.
Custom tables don’t inherit best practices or default roles.
Mistakes in permissions can lead to data leakage or broken access.
Admins often miss audit and hierarchy settings for custom tables.
Security matrix grows with every new entity added.
It requires close coordination with the security team.

Q44. Can too many custom entities affect system search or relevance scores?

Yes, global search gets cluttered and harder to fine-tune.
Relevance search prioritizes standard entities by default.
Custom entities require manual inclusion and ranking.
Users may miss important records if search is not configured well.
Performance drops if search indexing is mismanaged.
Keep custom entities searchable only when truly needed.

Q45. How do environment strategies (Dev/UAT/Prod) impact entity decisions?

Standard entities sync well across environments using managed solutions.
Custom entities require consistent schema promotion and testing.
Mistakes in field types or relationships break deployments.
Data seeding becomes a manual effort if entities are not aligned.
ALM pipelines need strict tracking for custom entities.
Consistency across environments is harder with too many custom components.

Q46. What happens when you try to apply out-of-the-box apps on top of a custom-heavy data model?

Many built-in features won’t work out-of-the-box.
Forms, charts, and processes will not bind to your custom entities.
You’ll spend time redesigning the UX to mimic native apps.
Custom tables break the plug-and-play nature of Microsoft solutions.
Updates become harder when you can’t reuse new features.
Platform flexibility drops drastically.

Q47. What are some signs a custom entity was a bad decision in hindsight?

Nobody uses it after go-live or it’s only used in one rare process.
Users are confused about which entity to log their records in.
You have duplicate data across entities for no good reason.
Integration teams refuse to map data because it’s unnecessary.
Training takes longer due to entity bloat.
That’s when you realize it should’ve been a custom field, not an entity.

Q48. What future-proofing questions should you ask when proposing a custom entity?

Will this entity still be needed in 2–3 years?
Could this data eventually be part of standard modules?
Are there Microsoft roadmap features that will overlap?
Will it impact AI, reporting, or user experience?
Does it scale well as business grows?
If any answer is unclear, hold off on creating it.

Q49. How do AI features like Copilot behave with standard vs custom entities?

Copilot natively understands standard entities and can suggest insights easily.
For custom entities, you need to configure and sometimes train the AI.
Data quality and schema alignment affect the quality of AI outputs.
Custom tables may not be indexed or eligible for AI at all.
You lose “just works” benefits unless you plan for Copilot compatibility.
If AI is part of the roadmap, lean towards standards where possible.

Q50. If you had to summarize one golden rule about using custom entities, what would it be?

“Only build custom entities when business needs cannot be solved otherwise.”
Every custom entity is a long-term commitment—maintenance, training, and risk.
Start with extending standard entities and build only if reuse truly fails.
Ask, “Can I achieve this with fields, forms, or processes on standard entities?”
If not, build custom—but document it clearly with solid justification.
Simplicity is power. Less is more when designing scalable solutions.

Post Views: 9