Pega Scenario-Based Questions 2025

This article concerns real-time and knowledgeable Pega Scenario-Based Questions 2025. It is drafted with the interview theme in mind to provide maximum support for your interview. Go through these Pega Scenario-Based Questions 2025 to the end, as all scenarios have their importance and learning potential.

To check out other Scenarios Based Questions:- Click Here.

Disclaimer:
These solutions are based on my experience and best effort. Actual results may vary depending on your setup. Codes may need some tweaking.

Question 1: What would you do if a Pega application’s performance starts degrading during peak hours?

First, I’d check if any data pages or report definitions are causing slowness due to large datasets.
I’d review performance alerts and PAL readings to find bottlenecks like excessive rule execution.
Often, too many clipboard pages or improperly scoped data pages cause memory issues.
I’d validate if background jobs or agents are running heavy logic during those hours.
A good practice is to use node-level data pages for shared, read-only data during high loads.
Performance profiling using Tracer and Performance Analyzer gives clues for specific slowness patterns.

Question 2: In a real project, how do you decide whether to use a Flow Action or a Local Action?

I use Flow Action when the user decision must move the case to the next stage or assignment.
If the user just needs to perform something temporarily (like updating data) without changing the stage, I go for Local Action.
In real-world cases, Local Actions are great for modal screens and data updates.
Flow Actions are tied with routing logic, so they should align with your business process flow.
Using the wrong type may confuse end-users or break stage transitions.
Always align this choice with UX and business process intent.

Question 3: What happens if multiple developers work on the same rule without proper branching?

The last saved version usually overrides others, leading to unexpected behavior.
In big teams, this causes rework, overwritten rules, or even broken app logic in QA.
Branching avoids this by letting devs work in isolated versions that can later be merged.
I’ve seen cases where teams didn’t branch properly and had serious production bugs.
Proper branching also makes code review and conflict resolution easier.
For teams, version control + clear merging strategy is non-negotiable.

Question 4: How do you handle scenarios where business wants to skip mandatory stages sometimes?

I avoid hardcoding stage transitions and use “Skip Stage” utility smartly.
I implement decision logic using conditions to determine when a stage should be skipped.
Skipping shouldn’t mean skipping validations — those should be decoupled from the stage.
Real-world example: In loan processing, skipping “Background Verification” if it’s already verified.
But I always document skipped paths for audit and process integrity.
Misusing skip logic can break downstream dependencies, so testing is key.

Question 5: What trade-offs did you face while deciding between a Data Page and a Report Definition?

Data Page gives caching, performance boost, and reuse across rules — very handy for reference data.
But Report Definition is better if I need dynamic querying or filtering by user input.
In one case, using Report Definition gave us real-time results, but no caching, which slowed things down.
So I sometimes call Report Definition from inside a Data Page for best of both worlds.
Decision depends on freshness needs vs performance needs.
Don’t blindly use one over another — match the data use pattern first.

Question 6: A case is stuck in an assignment, but no one can access it. What could be wrong?

Likely the case is locked by a user or agent who didn’t release it — check for locks.
Might be assigned to a non-existing operator or work queue due to deleted rules or roles.
I also check if the routing logic failed silently and the assignment was never created.
If it’s SLA-based routing, maybe the escalation failed midway.
In my projects, we added audit logs for routing to troubleshoot such issues.
Fixing stuck cases often involves both admin tools and audit trail reading.

Question 7: What are the risks of using too many Declare Expressions in a large application?

If overused, they can lead to performance issues because they fire reactively on property changes.
They also make debugging harder — properties update silently, confusing new developers.
In my experience, they’re great for calculated fields but risky for deep logic.
I’ve seen projects where too many declare expressions made performance unpredictable.
Better to limit them to UI-calculated fields or one-level business logic.
Always document their usage, especially if you’re chaining them.

Question 8: How would you deal with a client requesting real-time integration, but your system only supports batch?

I’d first explain the technical constraints and assess if near-real-time is acceptable instead.
Sometimes a hybrid approach works — batch every 5 mins with a trigger-based update for critical events.
In a real project, we used a queue processor that mimicked real-time with async polling.
I’d highlight cost and system impact of forcing real-time when infra isn’t built for it.
Business needs should shape the design — but so should system health and scalability.
Documenting these trade-offs keeps everyone aligned.

Question 9: How do you decide when to use an Agent vs a Queue Processor?

I use Agents for legacy processing or when system runs on versions below 7.3.
Queue Processors are preferred for scalable, multi-node async work — more future-proof.
Real example: We migrated agents to QP to fix threading and retry issues.
Agents are simpler but less transparent in troubleshooting failures.
Queue Processor gives visibility via Admin Studio and has better error handling.
Use Agents only when you absolutely can’t use newer features.

Question 10: What are the risks if you don’t define a proper Work Group structure?

Operators may not be able to pull work, or it might get routed to dead queues.
SLA and reporting could break because assignment tracking depends on work group setup.
I’ve seen cases where SLAs were missed because work got assigned to inactive worklists.
Good work group setup improves case routing and helps supervisors load-balance tasks.
It’s also key for escalations and dashboard visibility.
Always involve business teams while designing work groups.

Question 11: How do you handle a situation where users are complaining about slow UI screens in Pega?

First, I check for heavy UI sections loading unnecessary data pages or large lists.
Sometimes too many dynamic layouts or embedded sections cause rendering lag.
In one real case, collapsing non-essential sections by default improved load time by 40%.
I also avoid complex nested repeating grids — they kill performance fast.
Use performance profiler to trace which UI rules are consuming time.
Less is more — simplify screens wherever possible.

Question 12: What happens if you skip Access Control checks in a case type?

Users might access cases or perform actions they aren’t supposed to — a major security flaw.
I’ve seen data leaks happen in a project because role-based restrictions weren’t applied.
It also creates audit risks, especially in financial or healthcare domains.
Always define Access Roles, Privileges, and Class-level Access Control properly.
Never rely just on UI-level restrictions — backend access can still happen.
Security must be built into every layer, not just the front end.

Question 13: How do you explain the business risk of not using Case Lifecycle Management properly?

Without it, processes become hard to track, and stakeholders lose visibility.
I’ve seen cases where work stayed in one stage forever due to missing transitions.
Business misses out on SLA, reporting, and audit features when case lifecycle is ignored.
It also confuses end-users when there’s no proper flow between stages or steps.
Case Lifecycle adds structure, accountability, and process clarity.
It’s not just a tech feature — it’s core to how business operates.

Question 14: How do you prevent over-customization when building a Pega application?

Stick to reuse-first mindset — use OOTB rules unless there’s a clear gap.
Document every override and justify it with business reasoning.
I once saw a team copy 200 rules just to change labels — that created future nightmares.
Keep customization modular, so upgrades don’t break everything.
Set up peer reviews and architecture gates for risky changes.
Less customization = faster upgrades + easier maintenance.

Question 15: What would you do if a Queue Processor fails silently and no items are processed?

First, I check if the QP is enabled and the node is properly configured to process it.
Then, I check if any exception handler logic is swallowing errors without alerts.
In one case, the QP was paused after a node restart and nobody noticed.
We added alerts and retry mechanisms using Admin Studio to catch this earlier.
You can also route failures to a dead-letter queue for analysis.
Silent failures are dangerous — always monitor them.

Question 16: How do you decide between creating a Subcase or using a Child Case?

Subcases are used when the child has its own full lifecycle and needs tracking.
Child cases are lighter and often used for task splitting without full independence.
In our insurance app, claims investigation used Subcases for legal review steps.
You need to decide based on process ownership, reporting, and complexity.
Also consider reusability — Subcases can be reused across case types.
Don’t overuse either — too many levels create confusion.

Question 17: What kind of design issues have you seen when multiple case types depend on the same rules?

If rules aren’t organized modularly, changes in one case type break the other.
Business logic duplication leads to inconsistent behavior.
In a project, one update to a validation rule crashed five different flows.
The fix was rule specialization by case type and better naming convention.
Always use rule delegation and layering properly to manage reuse safely.
Don’t let one case type’s logic hijack another’s stability.

Question 18: How do you deal with excessive SLA breaches in a live system?

First, identify if the SLA goals are unrealistic or if the routing logic is faulty.
Often, work gets stuck with the wrong operator or in dead queues.
In one bank project, SLAs were missed due to absence management not being handled.
I use reports to track breached SLAs by reason and stage.
Sometimes increasing automation or escalation logic helps meet targets.
SLA health directly reflects business trust — can’t ignore it.

Question 19: What’s the impact of poorly designed data models in Pega?

You end up duplicating data across pages, which leads to sync issues.
Reporting becomes difficult because relationships aren’t clear.
In one real case, audit logs became useless due to inconsistent property usage.
Bad data model = poor performance, validation mess, and rework later.
I always create a data dictionary before development begins.
A clean model saves pain during upgrades and integrations.

Question 20: How would you respond if a business user asks for dynamic approval routing mid-sprint?

First, I check if we can accommodate it using Decision Tables or Data Transforms.
I push back on hardcoding user lists — promote a role- or condition-driven design.
One time, we used a dropdown-based approver selection to satisfy both flexibility and control.
I explain the testing and impact of mid-sprint changes on other logic.
If needed, I put it behind a feature toggle till fully tested.
Agile doesn’t mean unplanned chaos — business must align with delivery rhythm.

Question 21: What happens when you don’t properly configure SLA escalation actions?

The system might miss notifying stakeholders or reassigning tasks on time.
In a live project, escalations silently failed due to missing operator mappings.
Business starts losing control when tasks aren’t acted upon within expected time.
I always test escalation paths separately, not just the SLA timer.
Also, make sure escalation actions don’t overwrite business routing unintentionally.
Good escalation design keeps the flow moving, even in absence scenarios.

Question 22: How do you decide between using a stage-based or step-based flow design?

If business wants milestone-level tracking, stage-based makes more sense.
For micro-level, task-heavy flows, step-based is cleaner and easier to iterate.
I once used stage-based for an onboarding process where progress visibility was key.
Step-based flows work better in technical use cases like ticket triage.
The main factor is how the business perceives progress — think like the user.
Mixing both is okay, but avoid excessive nesting.

Question 23: What are the risks of using too many data transforms in one process?

It becomes hard to trace what’s changing what — debugging turns into guesswork.
I’ve seen developers chain 6–7 transforms for a single operation — not maintainable.
Also, silent overwrites can happen when multiple transforms set the same properties.
Better to modularize them — each transform should have one clear purpose.
Logging the transforms during test cycles also helps catch issues.
Keep it clean, or you’ll hate it during defect triage.

Question 24: A client demands full audit history of all property changes. What’s your approach?

I enable property-level auditing using Declare Triggers for key tracked fields.
For case-wide changes, I use field audit tracking or custom audit tables.
In a project with finance regulations, missing audit logs became a compliance risk.
Also include operator, timestamp, and old vs new value in your logs.
Avoid auditing everything — it can hit performance badly.
Always align with compliance and performance needs together.

Question 25: What would you do if a background job keeps failing, but logs show no error?

I’d first verify the agent or queue processor is actually picking up the item.
Then check if try-catch blocks are suppressing exceptions silently.
One real case involved a queue processor failing due to stale data pages, but logging nothing.
Re-enabling error logs at DEBUG level often uncovers hidden issues.
Also ensure dependent rules or records aren’t deleted or corrupted.
Silent errors need aggressive logging to isolate the cause.

Question 26: When should you say no to a business requirement, even if it’s technically doable?

When it impacts platform stability, performance, or future maintainability.
I’ve said no to complex screen designs that killed load times — explained with numbers.
Another example: real-time third-party calls for non-critical data — better done async.
It’s not about “can we build it” but “should we build it.”
Always back your denial with business impact, not emotion.
Respectful pushback earns long-term trust.

Question 27: What happens if you hardcode operator IDs or email addresses in your rules?

If that person leaves, the system breaks or sends sensitive data to the wrong user.
In a support app, this mistake caused alerts to go to an ex-employee.
Instead, I use dynamic roles, decision tables, or reference data to fetch assignments.
Hardcoding kills flexibility and increases risk during org changes.
Also makes deployment across environments harder.
Never hardcode people — systems should outlive personnel.

Question 28: How do you manage changes in business rules without breaking live cases?

I use rule versioning and leverage circumstancing where needed.
Also, data-driven rules help avoid hard rule changes mid-flight.
One case had over 500 live cases — so we split logic by creation date.
I avoid changing core decision logic directly unless it’s backward-compatible.
Staging rules and phased rollout are safer in regulated industries.
Test new logic on cloned test cases before going live.

Question 29: What are common mistakes teams make when migrating between Pega environments?

Forgetting to include linked rules or data instances like Access Roles or Data Pages.
In one QA move, a missing work queue caused routing failures post-migration.
Teams also skip rule resolution testing in the new environment.
Another common miss is environment-specific configurations like URLs.
We always use a deployment checklist + peer verification to catch these.
Migration should be planned like a release, not an afterthought.

Question 30: How do you handle a situation where users bypass validations using browser tricks?

I never rely on client-side validation alone — enforce everything in backend rules.
In one case, an editable field was hidden via UI but updated via browser tools.
Use Validate rules or activity checks before final submission.
Audit logs also help catch unusual property changes post-submit.
Education and governance play a role too — build user trust, not loopholes.
Security is layered — assume every user is a hacker.

Question 31: How would you explain the cost of poor exception handling in Pega to a client?

Unhandled exceptions cause work to vanish or break silently, which kills user trust.
One client lost 2 days of loan approvals due to silent failures in a connector call.
I show impact in terms of missed SLAs, manual effort, and end-user frustration.
Also, error screenshots or dead flows make business panic.
Proper exception flows, user-friendly messages, and error dashboards avoid this.
Clients listen when you show time loss, not just tech loss.

Question 32: What do you do when a connector rule keeps failing randomly in production?

I first check if the external system has downtime patterns or rate limits.
In one retail app, failures happened during peak checkout hours — external API was throttling.
Retry logic, circuit breakers, or queueing the call usually fix this.
Also log both request and response for post-mortem analysis.
Random issues are usually infra or timing-related — not logic.
Don’t panic — trace, test, and stabilize in layers.

Question 33: What’s your approach when stakeholders demand Excel-like features in a repeating grid?

I explain the limits of web vs Excel — editable grids can’t do everything Excel does.
One project tried to add Excel-style formulas, and performance tanked hard.
Instead, I give alternatives: bulk edit, inline edit, or export-import models.
Avoid letting UX overrule system sanity — clarify trade-offs clearly.
Let business try a prototype and feel the lag.
Education works better than argument here.

Question 34: How do you handle role conflicts when two teams want different access to the same case?

I map out both access models and identify overlaps and conflicts clearly.
In one bank case, fraud team and customer care both needed same case but different privileges.
Solution was layered roles with privilege-based Access When conditions.
Also, consider field-level security if needed.
Documenting the matrix helps get consensus faster.
Don’t assume — clarify and build what’s defensible.

Question 35: What are the red flags you look for in a Pega code review?

Rules with no comments or documentation — especially for complex decision logic.
Hardcoded values, unversioned rules, or copied rules without context.
Chained data transforms, large unoptimized reports, and UI rules with 10+ sections.
Missing exception handling in integrations is a big risk.
Also, I check for test coverage and rollback logic.
Code review is not just syntax — it’s process safety.

Question 36: How do you prevent over-automation in a business process?

Just because we can automate something doesn’t mean we should.
In a healthcare app, automating approvals led to compliance risks.
I always ask: does this need human judgment or audit trail?
Also check if automation hides problems instead of solving them.
Balance speed with control — not every task is a candidate.
Business must own the final say, not just tech teams.

Question 37: How do you make sure users don’t get lost in long Pega forms?

Break the form into multiple screens or tabs using screen flows or dynamic layouts.
Use progressive disclosure — show only what’s relevant right now.
In a past project, a 5-screen form got a 30% drop-off rate fixed after redesign.
Highlight the current stage or section for visual clarity.
Simpler UI = happier users = fewer support calls.
Form fatigue is real — design like a user, not a developer.

Question 38: What happens if you don’t configure rule availability properly?

Users might see deprecated or test rules in production — creates confusion.
In one case, a withdrawn rule accidentally triggered due to rule resolution glitch.
Always set availability to “Final” or “No/Draft” when rules are done or unused.
Use labels and documentation to guide team members.
Rule clutter leads to mistakes during enhancements or hotfixes.
Rule hygiene is silent success — no one notices until it’s bad.

Question 39: How do you prevent regressions when enhancing old case types?

Clone existing cases in lower environments and rerun old test paths.
I always maintain a minimal test pack for every release.
In one real example, a new validation rule blocked case closure — wasn’t caught till UAT.
Use feature toggles for gradual rollout if possible.
Regression issues often come from assumed logic, not obvious changes.
Test like a new user, not just a developer.

Question 40: A client wants Pega to look exactly like their existing legacy UI. How do you respond?

I explain that Pega follows design guidelines meant for clarity and performance.
Legacy UI often has clutter, colors, or flows not ideal for modern UX.
In a government project, we showed side-by-side comparison with usability feedback.
Mimicking legacy look defeats purpose of modernization.
Offer branded styling and layout tweaks without copying bad design.
Convince with user testing, not just mockups.

Question 41: What challenges arise when business insists on storing large documents directly in Pega?

It bloats the database fast, causing performance and backup issues.
In a case, 10MB PDFs per case caused nightly backups to fail due to size.
Best to offload large files to external storage like AWS S3 or SharePoint and link from Pega.
Document management isn’t Pega’s core strength — it’s a process platform.
Also slows down case opening and increases node memory usage.
Explain using numbers — storage cost, speed, and maintenance.

Question 42: What’s your approach when Pega reports start timing out during peak usage?

First, check for large joins or unindexed filters in the report definition.
In one insurance portal, reports used “Contains” on millions of records — huge lag.
Use dedicated reporting tables or BIX for heavy analytical needs.
Pagination, filtering at source, and optimized views often fix it.
Don’t just tune Pega — check DB stats and table sizes too.
Reporting needs its own performance game plan.

Question 43: What happens when people clone existing case types without proper cleanup?

You inherit all the unused rules, data models, and junk logic — technical debt explodes.
I saw a case type cloned 3 times — 70% of rules were never called.
Cleanup after cloning should be mandatory before any go-live.
Always rename, audit, and archive unwanted rules immediately.
Clone responsibly — or end up debugging ghosts.
Bad clone = bad karma in Pega.

Question 44: How do you respond if a stakeholder demands a last-minute stage in a live case flow?

I check impact — will it affect current cases or just new ones?
If yes, I assess whether the new logic can be circumstanced or split by version.
In one real example, we patched a new stage using a temporary flag for ongoing cases.
Never directly modify production flow unless you’ve impact-tested it.
Better to use alternate paths or temporary wrappers.
Communicate delays clearly — it’s safety over speed.

Question 45: What problems arise from inconsistent naming conventions in rules?

Hard to trace rule purpose or link it to case types — especially in big teams.
I once worked on an app where three “ProcessLoan” rules existed in different classes.
Searching and debugging becomes guesswork, not logic.
Naming conventions are part of system hygiene — not optional.
Define and enforce rule naming strategy early in the project.
Codebase clarity is a time-saver under pressure.

Question 46: How do you deal with business users constantly asking for cosmetic UI changes?

Set up a change freeze window during sprints — align UX tweaks with release cycles.
In one case, weekly color requests led to merge conflicts and deployment delays.
I suggest collecting feedback and batching UI changes to avoid chaos.
Educate users about the effort vs value of each change.
UI perfection isn’t worth back-end risk.
Give them a say, but draw the line.

Question 47: What if a deployment to UAT failed, but the same package worked in Dev?

Environment-specific references like URLs, operators, or access groups could be mismatched.
UAT might lack some data instances or config rules that Dev had.
I had a case where Dev used temp operators not existing in UAT — broke login.
Validate each environment’s setup during deployment planning.
Use pre-deployment checks, not just post-deployment fixes.
Success in Dev ≠ success in UAT.

Question 48: What’s your strategy to handle inflight case corruption in production?

First step: identify and isolate affected cases — don’t let more get corrupted.
Use tools like tracer, logs, or report definitions to find the pattern or rule causing it.
In one client system, property references were updated in an old data transform.
Create fix flows or utility rules to sanitize affected records.
Prevent it from recurring — don’t just fix manually.
Always pair correction with root cause.

Question 49: How do you ensure non-technical stakeholders understand complex decision logic?

I use decision tables or decision trees with real examples instead of plain rules.
In one tax app, we used “if-then” business terms to simplify approvals.
Visual aids or flowcharts help explain without jargon.
If a stakeholder can’t explain the logic, the rule needs redesign.
Simplicity is a feature, not a compromise.
Rule clarity = faster approvals and fewer defects.

Question 50: What risks come with underestimating testing in Pega upgrades?

Old case types may break due to deprecated APIs or changed behavior.
In one upgrade, data page scope changes caused case opening failures.
You must test integrations, custom code, and performance — not just login/logout.
Skipping regression testing can undo years of stability.
Include business users for UAT validation — they spot UI and logic gaps faster.
Upgrade success = 70% testing, 30% config.

Question 51: What happens if you don’t clean up clipboard pages during long user sessions?

Clipboard bloats fast, especially with deep nested pages — kills performance.
I saw a case where browser froze due to 80MB clipboard during tab switching.
Use data page scopes and refresh strategies wisely to avoid overload.
Don’t load everything “just in case” — load only when needed.
Periodically clear unused pages in long flows or dashboards.
Clipboard hygiene = smooth user experience.

Question 52: How do you approach a request for “undo” functionality in a case process?

I ask what level of undo is expected — one step, one stage, or full rollback?
In real life, we used temporary backup pages for one-screen undo in approvals.
Full undo is tricky in case flow — better to use alternate paths or withdrawal.
Document clearly what “undo” means for business vs system.
Sometimes it’s just about better confirmation prompts, not rollback.
Undo sounds small but needs careful design.

Question 53: What risks come up if deployment scripts skip class structure validation?

Rules might end up in wrong classes — causing rule resolution failures.
In one project, a case type was inaccessible because the flow landed in a different class layer.
Always validate class hierarchy alignment during deployment.
Also check inheritance — UI rules especially break silently.
Broken structure = hidden bugs + debugging nightmares.
Class chaos is expensive to fix post-go-live.

Question 54: How do you balance speed vs accuracy in SLA configurations?

I ask business if speed is the goal or correctness — rarely both at once.
In a helpdesk app, 2-hour SLA led to rushed resolutions without proper fixes.
It’s better to split SLAs: response time vs resolution time.
Use urgency smartly — don’t auto-close just to meet numbers.
SLA metrics should guide, not punish.
Align KPIs with human capacity, not ideal theory.

Question 55: What’s your approach if a client keeps asking to replicate another system’s workflow in Pega?

I ask what problem they’re solving, not what screen they’re copying.
In a loan processing app, replicating an Excel approval matrix wasted weeks.
Instead, I propose redesign using Pega capabilities: case types, roles, decision rules.
Show them what “better” looks like — not just “same.”
Migration is the chance to improve, not replicate.
Push value, not nostalgia.

Question 56: What problems occur if operators aren’t properly disabled or reassigned after exit?

Cases might get stuck with inactive users — SLA breaches, orphaned tasks.
I’ve seen escalations fail because the assigned user was long gone.
Always offboard operators with reassignment of open work.
Use reports to check aging tasks or inactive assignees.
Also disable access groups, teams, and schedules cleanly.
User exit = process cleanup, not just HR update.

Question 57: How do you handle legal or compliance audits in Pega applications?

I enable field-level tracking for sensitive fields and log all case updates.
In a health insurance app, we used snapshots and audit tables to pass HIPAA checks.
Also store decision logic with timestamps — who did what and why.
Avoid dynamic field additions without audit planning.
Reports, exports, and archives must match retention rules.
Audits aren’t last-minute — build for them from Day 1.

Question 58: What’s your process when a Pega release breaks integration with a downstream system?

I isolate the connector or response parsing logic first.
In one case, a minor format change in XML broke a response mapping silently.
Validate contract schemas and mock test every release.
Fallback logic helps — always prepare for nulls or missing fields.
Also notify integration partners before upgrades.
Integration breaks cost more than code bugs — always plan communication.

Question 59: What issues can arise from using deprecated rules in upgraded environments?

They may work today, but vanish or change behavior in future patches.
In Pega 8+, many older APIs are unsupported — caused silent failures in our 7.x upgrade.
Avoid rules marked “deprecated” or “legacy” in new dev.
If you must use them, wrap them and isolate the logic.
Upgrade readiness starts with smart rule selection.
Old rules = hidden tech debt.

Question 60: What’s your biggest lesson learned from a failed Pega project?

Over-customization without business ownership made the app unmaintainable.
Teams built for dev speed, not long-term changeability.
No documentation, no testing strategy, no rollback plans — all added up.
Pega gives you power, but you need governance to use it well.
Best lesson: Build for clarity, not cleverness.
Failure taught us how to design like humans, not just developers.

Post Views: 8